Matthew's World History Blog
Tuesday, December 8, 2015
Ch 7 Blogpost #7
Of the 3 possible roads, the road I would most want to travel if I was a woman would be the Silk Road. The Sea Road is automatically knocked out of the competition because being a woman (even a Captain) on a ship full of men is not a good idea. Sea voyages were very long, and it's quite possible for unwanted advances to occur. That leaves the Silk Road and the Sand Road as the remaining two possibilities. It's mentioned in the text that women are mostly valued for their reproduction capabilities the most for the Sand Road... This sounds much like the Sea Road already. Regardless of gender, the sand road has us traveling across the Sahara desert. Natural hazards such as dehydration, snakes, scorpions, etc, already make this road seem more unappealing. The Silk Road seems to be the most appealing due to the need for women in the work force, and the amount of goods specifically targeted at women, for example silk dresses and cotton textiles. Buddhism was also a popular religion among the cities along the Silk Road, and Buddhism is one of the more gender equal religions. These few positives stacked against the numerous negatives of the other two roads put the Silk Road way ahead.
Ch 4 Blogpost #6
How does Confucius understand the role of the supernatural ---- gods, spirits, and ancestors, for example?
Confucian values focused on the idea that humanity can continuously improve itself, and that each new generation should be better than their previous ancestors were. According to the Mandate of Heaven, Emperors were allowed to rule based on their ability to rule efficiently and correctly. Basically, if an Emperor does a good job and society is prospering, they are adhering to the Mandate. Confucian ideas did not deny the existence of spirits or god, but Confucianism did not focus on appeasing invisible gods, but rather on practicality and "reality". However, Confucianism did advise people to "participate in family and state rituals as if the spirits were present" (172 Ways of the World). Essentially, Confucianism has all of its bases covered in case god and the spirits are real. Confucius believed that the afterlife was beyond human understanding and that was his explanation for not focusing more of his philosophy on spirits and god.
Confucian values focused on the idea that humanity can continuously improve itself, and that each new generation should be better than their previous ancestors were. According to the Mandate of Heaven, Emperors were allowed to rule based on their ability to rule efficiently and correctly. Basically, if an Emperor does a good job and society is prospering, they are adhering to the Mandate. Confucian ideas did not deny the existence of spirits or god, but Confucianism did not focus on appeasing invisible gods, but rather on practicality and "reality". However, Confucianism did advise people to "participate in family and state rituals as if the spirits were present" (172 Ways of the World). Essentially, Confucianism has all of its bases covered in case god and the spirits are real. Confucius believed that the afterlife was beyond human understanding and that was his explanation for not focusing more of his philosophy on spirits and god.
Chapter 2 Blogpost #4
What philosophy of life comes across in the Gilgamesh story?
I believe the philosophy of life that comes across in the Gilgamesh story is that one should indulge in the simple pleasures of life while one can. The Gilgamesh story revolves around Enkidu becoming a man by abandoning his feral nature, laying with a woman for several nights, drinking beer and eating bread, and hunting his former animal companions. In this time period, I suppose that was all that there was to life because life was so much simpler. But, to someone looking in, it does seem like the Gilgamesh story proposes that gratification is the end goal and journey of life. Food, entertainment, and sex are the basic needs for a human being. I find this question ironic because philosophy is usually complex, but the Mesopotamian "philosophy" of life is base to me. I do come thousands of years ahead of their time though.
I believe the philosophy of life that comes across in the Gilgamesh story is that one should indulge in the simple pleasures of life while one can. The Gilgamesh story revolves around Enkidu becoming a man by abandoning his feral nature, laying with a woman for several nights, drinking beer and eating bread, and hunting his former animal companions. In this time period, I suppose that was all that there was to life because life was so much simpler. But, to someone looking in, it does seem like the Gilgamesh story proposes that gratification is the end goal and journey of life. Food, entertainment, and sex are the basic needs for a human being. I find this question ironic because philosophy is usually complex, but the Mesopotamian "philosophy" of life is base to me. I do come thousands of years ahead of their time though.
Monday, November 30, 2015
Ch 8 China Blogpost
The Classical China Expansion was indeed a renaissance that was just as significant as the renaissance in Europe. Firstly, we need to ensure that this classical expansion was a renaissance. According to Strayer, ""Culturally, this era has been regarded as a 'golden age' of arts and literature, setting standards of excellence in poetry, landscape painting, and ceramics." (367 Ways of the World). The European renaissance is often attributed to advancing technology and art, and from the book we can apply these same characteristics to China.
China is a superpower today, and it's important to look into the past and see how that superpower came to be today. It all boils down to education. Strayer notes on page 368 that education standards and sophisticated anti-cheating methods were enacted. The crux of a renaissance comes with intelligent thought process, and an advanced educational system is definitely the method to achieve greatness. However, it is also mentioned that "a substantial percentage of official positions went to the sons of the privileged, even if they had not passed the exams." (369 Ways of the World). This could count as evidence against the importance of the Chinese "renaissance", since they are still somewhat stuck in their high born ways.
Important inventions originated in China, such as the world's first printed books. These books included content pertaining to agriculture, religion, mathematics, and medicine. This definitely sounds like a golden age/renaissance, and the importance of printed books cannot be overstated. Mass production of knowledge leads to a more education, sophisticated, and dominant society.
A counter to this Chinese expansion being important is the fact that women were still treated as bargaining chips and objectified. Foot binding was a prevalent dis-pleasantry for the higher class female. The same old Confucian tradition influenced the role of women being small and insignificant compared to her sons, husband, and father.
Overall I belive it's true that this Chinese renaissance was just as important as the European one, but because we live in the west we tend to focus on the west.
Wednesday, November 18, 2015
Chapter 9 Blog Post
Considering the recent events in Paris, I wasn't too excited to read this chapter. I understand that ISIS does not represent all Muslims, but I found this chapter to be a classic case of "too soon". That being said, I did learn a few things. I did not know that Islam originally started with many deities and gradually witted down to one all powerful god (Allah). I also did not know that Muslim means "one who submits". I'm unsure if that is just a rough translation or if it's precise, because if it is precise wouldn't that mean that the word Muslim can be used in context outside of religion?
I found it humorous that the Quran's message calls out all of the other religions for deviating from what Muhammad perceive's as the correct path. The points that it makes about the other religions are valid from an analytical standpoint, but in doing so it just sounds like the typical "my religion is right and yours is wrong" statement. The problem I face with having any faith is that in the past and present we mostly hear about the negative parts of religion. Killing in the name of an invisible god would sound like schizophrenia to a psychologist. This reminds me of one of my favorite quotes:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able to?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent?
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
-Epicurus
I found it humorous that the Quran's message calls out all of the other religions for deviating from what Muhammad perceive's as the correct path. The points that it makes about the other religions are valid from an analytical standpoint, but in doing so it just sounds like the typical "my religion is right and yours is wrong" statement. The problem I face with having any faith is that in the past and present we mostly hear about the negative parts of religion. Killing in the name of an invisible god would sound like schizophrenia to a psychologist. This reminds me of one of my favorite quotes:
Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able to?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent?
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?
-Epicurus
Monday, November 16, 2015
Ch 10 The Worlds of Christendom Blog Post
I suppose it makes sense that in the Middle East some local Muslim rulers were accepting of the Christian faith and others were not. Considering the time period, it's pretty interesting to read that some just taxed people of different faith as opposed to becoming violent. However, much like the U.S.'s birth, I could see this way of accepting another's religion ending badly.
It appears Egpyt also went this route; followers of the christian faith were second class citizens but protected because they paid more. To someone who firmly believe in Christianity, I wonder if they just considered it a tithe? Of course, religion and politics mixed quite a lot back then (and it still does today, even in America). Off topic, but it's always bothered me that the president of the U.S. is sworn in with a hand on the bible instead of the constitution, because the bible does not dictate the president's actions.
It appears Egpyt also went this route; followers of the christian faith were second class citizens but protected because they paid more. To someone who firmly believe in Christianity, I wonder if they just considered it a tithe? Of course, religion and politics mixed quite a lot back then (and it still does today, even in America). Off topic, but it's always bothered me that the president of the U.S. is sworn in with a hand on the bible instead of the constitution, because the bible does not dictate the president's actions.
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Ch 6 African Blog Post
Focusing on the Americas was the more obvious choice, but I decided to just read the African portion of this chapter. I've heard from people in different societies that America has a very skewed view of Africa. We think that it's mostly a disease ridden, warlord styled continent. And maybe it was, in the past. Reading this chapter will probably not break me out of my mold, but it's important to go outside of my comfort zone, so I am going to read the African portion of this chapter.
Typically when we think of an uncivilized area, we think of a lack of roads, heavy forests, wild animals lurking about every corner. Based off of this, Africa fits this description. Strayer mentions that the main difference between the Americas and Africa at this point in time was that Africa is bisected by the equator, so there is a tropical climate. Africa seems to have a predisposition of appearing uncivilized due to its nature and how it conflicts with western values.
It was interesting to read that a certain Kingdom of Meroe was governed by women on at least 10 occasions (again according to Strayer). Despite the outward appearance of being a "savage land", early African civilizations have some semblance of progressive ideals.
Typically when we think of an uncivilized area, we think of a lack of roads, heavy forests, wild animals lurking about every corner. Based off of this, Africa fits this description. Strayer mentions that the main difference between the Americas and Africa at this point in time was that Africa is bisected by the equator, so there is a tropical climate. Africa seems to have a predisposition of appearing uncivilized due to its nature and how it conflicts with western values.
It was interesting to read that a certain Kingdom of Meroe was governed by women on at least 10 occasions (again according to Strayer). Despite the outward appearance of being a "savage land", early African civilizations have some semblance of progressive ideals.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)